5.23.24
I used to tell
people that, “Everyone lies about two things: sex and money.” I still mostly
think this is true.
And it is
interesting to think about why these concepts belong in the same sentence,
occupy much of the same overlapping space in our individual and collective psyches.
(If you doubt this, consider that the biggest news story of the week in the US is
about hush MONEY paid to a porn-star for SEX by a former president.) But I don’t
want to talk about sex here, this blog attempts to evade the lurid for the most
part.
So let’s talk about
money.
In particular, I
find that many people have a very complicated and awkward relationship with
money. Mostly people are quite lousy at managing it or thinking about it as an
objective math-problem, which it mostly should be. And people do lie about it
compulsively. And even a few folks who are pretty good at managing or tracking
or growing it still seem to allow it to cast undue emotional shadows on their
lives. (I’m one of these.)
Now for some folks –
regrettably many around the world – the push to have enough, to sustain for
their families, to avoid starvation, afford clothes, shoes, school for the
kids, and so on really is a daily struggle. But for many in the developed
world, this is simply no longer the situation. We live in a time of profound
abundance, and, yes, the price of milk is high now, but folks are mostly carrying
iPhones so…
Why are well-enough off people still
constantly stressed by and defined by money or worry about its lack?
A friend tells
me “90% of my stress is about money” but on the same day tells me, “I’ve been
to all but 2 of the Top 30 restaurants in Austin.” So it isn’t that we don’t
have money, are starving, existing at a subsistence level. It’s that our desire
for a relative level of wealth drives anxieties. (This is not a new concept so
far Thorstein Veblen pointed this out at the turn of the last century in his
scathing critiques of the well-to-do.) Why do people who have plenty still get
so obsessed about being able to have even more in order to experience the more
rarified things money can buy?
There’s something
more here too though: I recently had a call with two brilliant researchers from
Technion, the Israeli Institute of Technology. Their focus is on economics,
currencies, the use of money and tokens as a symbol of trust, proof of work, and
so on. Obviously there are Web3 implications to this kind of research but I
find myself thinking of it more as a “Three body problem” of economics. This is
highly theoretical stuff with deep real-world application. And it speaks again
to the importance of this abstract concept: Why do homo sapiens – the really
smart ones and the less-so – all get so obsessed over this concept?
And what does any of this have to do with
the creative impulse or creation in general?
This one is easier
for me to answer, I think. Some people are inherently driven by a desire to
create things. Others mostly focus on consuming. (I have yet to meet anyone who
would self-describe as being in that latter camp, but people show you who they
are in what they do. “What is something you’re proud of creating this month?”
If the answer is, “Oh, I haven’t had time…” Well, there you go.) But many of
the things that the monkeys imagine and want to create (pyramids, AAA video
games, etc.) take the concerted efforts of many people over time to come to fruition.
This means that in order to succeed at creating some kinds of things, you must
be able to persuade (or compel through force, in the case of the pyramids) many
others to devote significant portions of their time to a particular goal. This
means you need to pay them. And this forces some part of most creative
activities at scale to become financial exercises.
So it is virtually
impossible to disentangle some categories of creative enterprise from discussions
of money.
The role of sex and
the desire-for-sex in motivating creation will have to wait for a later entry! 😉
No comments:
Post a Comment